Many children and adults struggle with motor coordination, learning difficulties, emotional regulation, and sensory processing challenges. Reflex integration methods use movement-based exercises to help the brain mature, improving focus, coordination, and emotional balance.
With several different approaches available, how do you determine which one best fits your needs? This article provides a clear and unbiased comparison of the most widely used methods, including their strengths, limitations, and ideal applications.
1. Blomberg Rhythmic Movement Training (BRMT)
Overview
Developed by Dr. Harald Blomberg, BRMT is based on natural, rhythmic baby movements that support reflex integration, brain development, and emotional well-being. It is used worldwide for conditions such as ADHD, dyslexia, autism, sensory processing challenges, and motor coordination difficulties.
Key Features
✔ Uses gentle, natural movement patterns rather than forced exercises.
✔ Based on clinical experience and neurological principles.
✔ Addresses a wide range of challenges, including cognitive, motor, and emotional issues.
✔ Suitable for children and adults, adaptable to individual needs.
Best For:
- Individuals with learning difficulties, ADHD, autism, or motor coordination issues.
- Those looking for a holistic, flexible approach to reflex integration.
Potential Limitations:
- Requires consistent practice for best results.
- Less structured assessment process compared to some diagnostic-based methods.
2. Rhythmic Movement Training International (RMTi)
Overview
Created by Moira Dempsey, RMTi is based on rhythmic movement principles and offers structured training and certification.
Key Differences from BRMT:
| Feature | BRMT | RMTi |
|---|---|---|
| Founder | Dr. Harald Blomberg | Moira Dempsey |
| Approach | Flexible, individualized | Structured, certification-based |
| Research Base | Clinical application | Focus on practitioner training |
| Scope | Reflex integration + emotional/cognitive support | Reflex integration-focused |
Best For:
- Individuals or professionals seeking a structured training system.
- Reflex integration as the primary focus rather than broader brain and emotional development.
Potential Limitations:
- Less adaptable to individual needs compared to BRMT.
- More standardized exercises, which may not fit everyone’s requirements.
3. Masgutova Neurosensorimotor Reflex Integration (MNRI)
Overview
Founded by Dr. Svetlana Masgutova, MNRI is a highly detailed, protocol-driven method that focuses on manual techniques, pressure points, and movement exercises to integrate retained reflexes.
Key Features
✔ Highly structured and detailed approach with assessments.
✔ Often used for neurological trauma, cerebral palsy, and severe developmental delays.
✔ Includes manual therapy techniques in addition to movement exercises.
Best For:
- Individuals with severe neurological impairments or trauma.
- Those needing a highly structured, therapist-led program.
Potential Limitations:
- Can be intensive and practitioner-dependent, making it harder for parents to implement at home.
- Less emphasis on natural movement patterns compared to BRMT and RMTi.
4. INPP Method (Institute for Neuro-Physiological Psychology)
Overview
Founded by Peter Blythe and Sally Goddard Blythe, INPP specializes in assessing retained primitive reflexes and prescribing specific movement exercises to address them.
Key Features
✔ Strong emphasis on diagnostic testing before treatment.
✔ Used in clinical and school settings.
Best For:
- Individuals looking for a structured assessment-based approach.
- Schools and professionals conducting formal reflex screenings.
Potential Limitations:
- Exercises can feel mechanical compared to natural movements.
- Less focus on emotional regulation or whole-body integration.
5. Brain Gym® – A Simple, Learning-Focused Approach
Overview
Developed by Dr. Paul Dennison, Brain Gym® consists of 26 simple movement exercises designed to improve focus, coordination, and learning.
Key Features
✔ Easy to use in classrooms and at home.
✔ Designed to enhance cognitive performance and learning skills.
Best For:
- Individuals struggling with reading, writing, and attention challenges.
- Teachers and parents looking for quick, practical exercises.
Potential Limitations:
- Not a full reflex integration method—focuses more on cognitive function than motor development.
- Less research-backed compared to other approaches.
Which Reflex Integration Method is Right for You?
| Method | Best For | Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRMT | ADHD, dyslexia, autism, motor skills, emotional regulation | Natural movements, clinical experience-based, adaptable | Requires consistent practice |
| RMTi | Reflex integration | Structured certification program | Less flexible than BRMT |
| MNRI | Neurological trauma, severe motor issues | Highly detailed, therapist-led | Intensive, complex protocols |
| INPP | Diagnostic-driven reflex testing | Strong assessment process | Exercises can feel mechanical |
| Brain Gym® | Learning enhancement | Simple and accessible | Limited reflex integration focus |
Final Thoughts
If you’re looking for a natural, adaptable, and research-based approach to reflex integration and brain development, BRMT stands out as a comprehensive option. However, if you prefer a more diagnostic or therapist-led program, methods like INPP or MNRI may be better suited. For quick cognitive boosts in a classroom setting, Brain Gym® can be useful.
Would you like to learn more about how BRMT can support you or your child? Explore BRMT courses, training programs, and success stories today!